PDA

View Full Version : Wacko Jacko Strikes Again! The Horror!


ZekeyLizard
19-11-2003, 09:41 PM
Wacko Jacko: Empire Strikes Back

Wacko Jacko: Reloaded

Wacko Jacko: The Temple of Doom


Seriously?
Why is this man not locked up?
He has proven several times that he is completely insane, and yet we let him run free in the streets!
If you dont know who I am reffering to, I am talking about Micheal Jackson.
I firmly beleive he is a talented musician/psychopath.
What say thee, Good Electro, Semi-Circle, Snortlehog, and Fatbear?

fat bear
19-11-2003, 09:44 PM
Even though it is horrifying to look at him, he still has not done anything wrong...yet (motions little Timmy to go for Micheal Jackson while holdind a camcorder and with his pants down)

often Ndisguise
19-11-2003, 09:46 PM
i think there is going to be enough evidence to convict him in this latest case. There was enough evidence against him for the police to issue a warrant for his arrest. A judge also backed up this warrant.

70 men were searching his house today.

Jacko obviously has done something very very naughty

its damn sad that a man with such talent has virtually destroyed himself

king of all pie
19-11-2003, 09:48 PM
as he would say himself 'what's wrong with a little kid climbing into bed, having a nice plate of cookies and warm milk and then some real hardcore sex?'

often Ndisguise
19-11-2003, 09:50 PM
everything.:mad:

squealpiggy
19-11-2003, 10:11 PM
Did you know that a journalist has spent months getting references together and getting a job in Buckingham Palace, worked there for 2 months and managed to get into various royal bedchambers for a story for the Mirror newspaper, then he wrote and published it to coincide with Mr Bush's visit... only for that to be the same day a Premiership footbaler gets charged with rape and a warrant gets released for the arrest of michael jackson!

Gutted...

Sloth
20-11-2003, 06:01 AM
talent? maybe in a far and distant past... "Jacko" has become irrelavent for about 10 years now... he has been reduced to nothing more than a side show... something for everyone to stop fighting about the future of the world... point and laugh...

frankly... i think the world can't survive if he is found guilty and put in prison... how could we live if we found out the next exciting episode won't be for another 20-30 years?

squealpiggy
20-11-2003, 06:32 AM
I somehow think that the world would last longer than Jackson in prison.

Beef Magic
20-11-2003, 08:23 AM
*sits on a tree singing 'Billie Jean'*

Mexican Pie
20-11-2003, 08:47 AM
He apparently molested a boy with cancer... sick muttha fuckar!

I saw off with his Johnson, and glue it to his head so that kids run away from him so that he doesn't ejaculate on them.

Jackson looks like a Monkey. Not Monkeh from Weebl and Bob cartoons- he rocks:).

Magpie
20-11-2003, 10:45 AM
Slight problem.

the police chief accidently said they've had evidence but didn't act on it now.

meaning he was leaving Jackson with the kids, simply to make a better case.

Jackson's defence will use this alot I'm guessing.


(if he does go to Jail i'm betting it'll be solitary confinement as pedophiles last a very short time amongst the more "manly" prisoners who may have kids on the outside who they can't protect.)

squealpiggy
20-11-2003, 11:50 AM
Most people will be thinking "there's no smoke without fire" which is one reason why reporting on crimes should be banned until after a verdict is delivered (apart from an appeal for information or witnesses of course).

As for Jackson being in solitary, don't forget that prisn staff hate paedos too, so eventually he would be integrated into the prson population.

smiley clown
20-11-2003, 03:23 PM
Poor,poor man.

Playbus
20-11-2003, 04:53 PM
Posted by ZekeyLizard
He has proven several times that he is completely insane, and yet we let him run free in the streets!


One word --- MONEY. Three more words -- LOTS OF IT.

Ninja Duck
20-11-2003, 06:11 PM
I was suprised when I learned he wasn't convicted earlier.

cadex
20-11-2003, 07:05 PM
the man has a condition known as BDD, body dismorphic disoder.

he believes he is ugly, no matter what, he thinks he is ugly.
more than ugly, he is always disgusted with his appearance and feels he will never been happy with what he sees in the mirror.

He was brought up in extra ordinary conditions, constantly in the spotlight.
when he wasnt in the spotlight, he was beaten and abused.
he didnt have a child hood.

he has spent his entire life on tv, on the radio and in newspapers.

He has led a far from normal life, so dont you think he may just be a far from normal person?

people should give him some slack.

Everyone loves taking the piss out of people who are different, especialy if they are famous and different.

people loooooooove taking the piss out famous people, especialy if they are different, and even more so if they are to be seen doing normal things.

the public expect celebraties to be entertainers 24/7, we'll jacko knows this and he has tried to put on a show all through his life for you, the public.

He has been pushed and pulled, shouted at and spat at, its little wonder he has gone sideways.

He has been broken.


I was Micheal Jacksons biggest fan. I loved him, absolutely adored him, wanted to be him.
I've watched him be ripped apart by people for the last 10 years.

now with more people trying to cash in with all the claims over his over friendly attitude with kids. Personaly, I think its a load of bollocks.
This is America were talking about, these people will do anything to get their hands at the cash.
So they think "who has lots of money?" "who is easy to set up due to their reputation?"

doesnt take much to work it out.


Leave the man alone.

stav
20-11-2003, 07:08 PM
well put cad i fully agree with you

EasyTiger
20-11-2003, 07:12 PM
me too. Very well said.

I defended him throughout the whole Martin Bashir thing. I believe personally he's not had a childhood, and so he's trying to re-live that now by being around children and doing things with them which to the outside world, yes is a little odd, but to him it's just 'normal'.

My opinion anyway.

squealpiggy
20-11-2003, 07:44 PM
I think he has a right to a fair trial just like anyone else but if he is guilty of molesting children, what then?

EasyTiger
20-11-2003, 07:47 PM
I always thought the phrase was 'innocent until proven guilty' not the other way around...

If he's guilty then yes, i'll hold my hands up and say i'm wrong. If however he is guilty, I personally believe it will be a mental thing with him - i.e nothing intentionally malicious...

PoofBird
20-11-2003, 08:32 PM
Originally posted by EasyTiger
I always thought the phrase was 'innocent until proven guilty' not the other way around...

i was just going to say that.

if he is convicted, we'll know, and he'll get what's coming to him

'till then: quit the witch-hunt, friggin' lynch mob! :evil:

squealpiggy
20-11-2003, 09:06 PM
The first part of that sentence is that I believe he should have a fair trial. But if he is...

I personally think it should be illegal to report on any crime until a verdict has been delivered as I have already mentioned.

William Wallace
26-11-2003, 02:01 AM
Originally posted by ZekeyLizard
Wacko Jacko: Empire Strikes Back

Wacko Jacko: Reloaded

Wacko Jacko: The Temple of Doom


Seriously?
Why is this man not locked up?
He has proven several times that he is completely insane, and yet we let him run free in the streets!
If you dont know who I am reffering to, I am talking about Micheal Jackson.
I firmly beleive he is a talented musician/psychopath.
What say thee, Good Electro, William Wallace, Semi-Circle, Snortlehog, and Fatbear?

The Smoking Gun- Michael Jackson's troubles (http://thesmokinggun.com/archive/mjsearch1.html)

DEFINITELY NOT SAFE FOR WORK!

VERY DISTURBING! EXPECT NIGHTMARES AND VOMITING AFTER READING THIS!

often Ndisguise
26-11-2003, 02:06 AM
weird shiznit

ZekeyLizard
26-11-2003, 02:53 AM
Shid weirznit

Dude
26-11-2003, 12:11 PM
Yes......

Me gots a joke....

What time does micheal jackson go to bed?
When the big hand touches the little hand.

:D

I heard it yesterday.

Funny no?

Dødens Knekt
26-11-2003, 12:23 PM
no

squealpiggy
26-11-2003, 02:22 PM
I have just seen this headline: http://www.itv.com/news/745957.html

Twatybollocks
26-11-2003, 03:44 PM
Basically the guys had lots of kids at his house and I believe it was all innocent fun, no touching up the kids, the adult thinking he's still a kid etc but he should have known better. He's an adult, he's got millions and as such it would only be a matter of time before some greedy parents used their child to get their hands on a big fat settlement.

Personally I think he should have gone to court last time instead of settling, it is somewhat suspicious to me that the same lawyer who got him to settle last time is handling the prosecution case again.

I mean, how many kids has he had at Neverland? 10, 20, over a hundred? Yet in all that time only 2 have complained. Surely Macaulay Culkin would have said something if he was molested or if he had seen any abuse going on!

squealpiggy
26-11-2003, 05:55 PM
Well I would hold off until a verdict has been delivered.

SemiCircle
26-11-2003, 09:58 PM
cadex, the way you are speaking, it sounds like you'd let him go free whether they find he's been molesting the kids or not. so what if he's had a shitty life? if he's a danger to society, in any way, lock him up. a crazy person who feels up little boys is just as bad as a sane one.
nevertheless, if he's innocent he should go free, with my pity but not my sympathy. (i never liked him, and i don't see why i should start just because everyone else is out to get him.) a freak he may well be, but if he's a harmless freak then he's got as much right to walk the streets as you or i.

and he doesn't have any money. he's on the verge of bankruptcy. his record deal with sony has fallen apart, and he owes millions to various banks. he has no stable income, and his record sales can't support his ridiculous lifestyle.

squealpiggy
26-11-2003, 10:43 PM
What's ridiculous about living in a theme park with it's own zoo and your best friend for several years being a chimpanzee?! You nazi!:D

Dødens Knekt
26-11-2003, 11:01 PM
SemiCircle, no one has proven anything yet, and I'm certain Cadex does not think it's ok to molest kids just because you've had a bad childhood.

To me it looks like a huge bunch of greedy people are doing their best to get some fast cash. The childs father has been abusing other familymembers several times, and the mother is a drug addict. I think I'll trust M.J. in this case...

thread rated one for accusations without actual proof or real backing...

Rogue
27-11-2003, 12:50 PM
Here is an article that mentions possible evidence against jackson:

jackson case (http://dailytelegraph.news.com.au/story.jsp?sectionid=1260&storyid=534904)

squealpiggy
27-11-2003, 05:30 PM
It still hasn't been proven beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law.

Rogue
27-11-2003, 05:45 PM
yes. but people have the right to think what they want to about the guy. personally I think he is guilty. Why? Because this is the second time it has happened. Also there is no smoke w. out fire.

Destrukto
27-11-2003, 05:50 PM
Originally posted by Rogue
yes. but people have the right to think what they want to about the guy. personally I think he is guilty. Why? Because this is the second time it has happened. Also there is no smoke w. out fire.

People have the right to think what they want, true, but to the penalty system this means nothing.

The one thing that is very difficult with judging celebreties is that it's very difficult to find an impartial jury...

I feel much better suspending my judgement until i can get my facts straight as to this case.

Also, you are now stretching a material metaphor to an immaterial plane ;)

Rogue
27-11-2003, 05:57 PM
Originally posted by Destrukto
People have the right to think what they want, true, but to the penalty system this means nothing.

Also, you are now stretching a material metaphor to an immaterial plane ;)

That is true. I think it is very good that no angry mobs of villagers can go about hanging people on whim.

However, i do think it is fair that an entertainers career ends up taking a nose dive because of public perception of their behavior.

As far as the material thing...isn't m. jackson the material girl....ohhh wait thats madonna. tee hee.

squealpiggy
27-11-2003, 06:11 PM
Originally posted by Rogue
yes. but people have the right to think what they want to about the guy. personally I think he is guilty. Why? Because this is the second time it has happened. Also there is no smoke w. out fire.

To me this is the main reason why I think it should be illegal to report any names relating to a crime until after a verdict has been delivered. Imagine a man meets a woman at the bar, they get drunk, they have sex, they start seeing one another, after a couple of weeks he decides it isn't working, ends it, she doesn't want to end it. So she says to the police "He abused me, he raped me" whatever. The police later drop the charges and the guy goes free. Everyone who knows either party will be wary about this guy. Why? Because there's no smoke without fire. Even better, because it wasn't like he was proven innocent, there just wasn't enough evidence to prove him guilty...

Is this fair on the guy? Of course it isn't.

OK now multiply this by a million. You're talking someone very famous with seemingly a lot of money. Someone could bring allegatons to get a payout. Someone could bring allegations for the fame themselves, or just because they're pissed off the the relationship ended. Either way it is difficult to get the person a fair trial in court because of jury bias. Furthermore it is impossible to get a fair trial in the public because the public read one sensationalist story saying the evidence against and that's it, their mind is made up.

Rogue
27-11-2003, 07:45 PM
as far as i am concerned: alls fair in love and war;)

ZekeyLizard
27-11-2003, 08:02 PM
Spooky.
My thread has come back from the dead.

Rogue
28-11-2003, 02:38 AM
in what way?

Mr.3374
30-11-2003, 06:19 AM
Originally posted by Pinkerbell
After all he's gone through, you have to kinda feel sorry for him. The man is nuts. I don't know what's going on with him, but I hope he gets help. He is such a talented person, but I guess his own demons are slowly destroying him. Let's just all hope he is innocent.

He is innocent.
He hasn't been found guilty of anything as yet,only charged with alleged offences.

Flower
01-12-2003, 10:56 AM
No smoke without fire eh?

I think there are a lot of people who are damn good at making smoke when not only is there no fire, there is no spark, or even a lighbulb. Some of them get paid for creating giant plumes of fireless smoke.

I have no idea whether Jackson is guilty or not (quite frankly i really don't care). However much i read in the papers or on the net I still know very little of the actualy facts. And without the facts I can't make a decision.

Ratboy
05-12-2003, 06:59 PM
try playing the " nonce or babysitter" game on rob manuel's site, and you may be surprised to learn that he has never been proven guilty. So you can all stop claiming he is mad: I trust the system.

Sre, say i must be blind, but were better of with the system than without- I mean, if it were left to the press, I think most of us would be in prison- or used by them to entertain others, at £5.00 a time.

I'll shut up now.