PDA

View Full Version : Wanted, New Star Sign


Zhyl
27-01-2006, 05:49 PM
Breaking news today as everyone born under the star sign of Taurus was run over by a bus. This was heartbreak to any star sign with whom they are compatible. Of course, this not only renewed the debate on whether astrology can really tell the future or just a load of bollocks that they print in Ladies magazines but also means that there is now a vacancy for a new star sign. I have gathered a few contenders that may hope to become like all the other star signs: a load of waffle.

Without further ado:

Who ate all the Pisces

Waatps are fat. They are born lovers of food and continue to be so throughout their lives to the degree that they are morbidly obese by the age of nine. They are generally good with Cancers and Capricorns but will only find love with Pisces. Beware of having children with one as they will probably get eaten. This week, Waatps will get a sum of money, which they will spend on food.

Egonus

Out of all the star signs, Egoni are the most selfish. They find discomfort in sharing the earth with other people and rarely tolerate sharing where it can be avoided. Hardly anybody likes them as they don’t like to share themselves with others. Not compatible with anyone. This week, the Egonus’ energy source planet is being eclipsed by Pluto, so they will be forced to buy a round down the local.

Pyrex

Born in a test tube, Pyrex are inquisitive, bright and intelligent. They spend most of the time in labs trying to learn more about themselves and the world around them. They are hard wearing, practical and very popular, particularly with casseroles. They have been known to crack under pressure. At such a time they will seek refuge on the high seas and relax by robbing merchant ships of gold and then burying it. This week, Pyrexians must be on the look out for love from a mysterious dish.

Binoggini

Binogginis are usually indecisive on account of having two heads. After killing their mother during birth, they are probably the biggest drag in a friendship group. One head is intelligent and an all round good person to be with but has a face like a horses backside. The other is as thick as it gets but is usually sexually irresistible. This can lead to immature arguments over irrelevant or insignificant things. They get on well with Aquarius and Leo, often at the same time. This week, Binogginis must be careful as one head is planning to kill the other.

Suicius

Very emotional, they usually have a very negative thinking pattern. They mainly experience: depression, anger, broken or strained relationships, grief, anxiety, low self-esteem, panic, abnormal fears, resentment, jealousy, guilt, despair, fatigue, tension, boredom, loneliness, withdrawal, obsessive and negative thinking, worry, compulsive behaviour but are nromally quite cheerful with it. They amazingly gather a few friends who soon regret it. When the feelings get suicidal, they need to be ignored. Don’t hang around with them. Suicis must not make any plans for this week.

Tore-Arse (the Bullshitter)

Untrustworthy, they have a natural tendency to over-exaggerate ( I've told them millions of times not to). Whatever they say is either blown out of all proportion or just an all out lie. They are seemingly good people to get along with at first as they can manipulate their image to suit whoever they want to befriend. However, the illusion is lost over time. If they genuinely make a friend or form a relationship they have a habit of backstabbing. Noticing a Tore-Arse is the first step to avoiding one. This week all Tore-Arses will tell someone of their spying missions on Russian sub-marines.

What does the future hold for you?

crab
27-01-2006, 06:32 PM
Nicely done, but six more needed... Be sure to make sure your articles are finished.

Zhyl
27-01-2006, 06:36 PM
Well I suppose, but i designed it so i wouldn't have to replace them ALL. If i ran out of ideas i would be covered. I will work on it over the coming weeks.

Thomp
27-01-2006, 06:55 PM
Basically mate, don't make so many articles. Find a topic that can be quite humourus (sp?) and spend time planning out your paragraphs and hints of funny-ness. In the end, you will have a much better article than the rushed stuff you keep producing

mooatr
27-01-2006, 07:02 PM
IT'S SPELT HUMOROUS. Take note, because I have noticed loads of people going 'hummusormouse (sp)' or something with this word quite a lot. It's getting quite irritating.

HUMOROUS

Zhyl
27-01-2006, 07:06 PM
Sorry about there being so many rushed articles. I have been working hard on them, honestly. I'm just eager to make one that will get there. Probably never going to happen though...

My theory is that a shorter article is easier on the old attention span. I've had these checked by several people i consider "funny". Is that not enough!?

Oh well, I will have to work really really hard on my next one.

Darkscull
27-01-2006, 07:11 PM
IT'S SPELT HUMOROUS. Take note, because I have noticed loads of people going 'hummusormouse (sp)' or something with this word quite a lot. It's getting quite irritating.

HUMOROUS

however, 'humor' is the american version, 'humour' is the british one. so it makes sense that humorous would be the american one, but what is the british one? humourous would make sense, but looks wrong.

anyway, good article zhyl... reminded me a lot of books like flanimals.

who ate all the pisces is my favourite... although the picture is quite disgusting

IrishSteve
27-01-2006, 08:07 PM
Shorter articles = good. Duck-billed Platypus = funny. Oh I don't know. Im just a toaster.

Zhyl
28-01-2006, 09:54 AM
:)

Shave
28-01-2006, 03:28 PM
or we could post our comment in this thread. if you deserve a plus you will get one

Zhyl
30-01-2006, 05:03 PM
All mis-thingys edited out. Any ideas for more star signs? I spent bloody hours thinking them up. Ungrateful public, humph. Mutter mutter... rushed, how dare they... mutter mutter.

Shave
05-02-2006, 03:16 PM
you shouldn't do it by bumping your own thread with a double post

Zhyl
06-02-2006, 03:48 PM
Oooh, moody. Shane, you are ever critical. Possibly the most pedantic and persickety person i have encountered so far. Is it not possible for you to look at the GOOD points of what I'm doing instead of forever putting me down? Well I know that's a hard thing to ask from someone not nearly as high or experienced as you in the way of the forums* but you could cut me a little slack.

Lured
10-05-2006, 08:56 PM
Shane Mate If You Don't Like It Piss Off Yeah?!

I'm Sure All Of Us Would Enjoy That.

Zhyl, I Will Get Your Answers Off Of You!


:weebl:*punches A Munty Flumple In The Face Then Runs From The Oncoming Adult Mernumbler Which Is Actully Running Towards A Grundit That Was Bullying Its Young-un ONLY 'COS I TOLD IT TO COZ I'M EVILLL* :weebl:

Dolphins Were Monkeys, When Monkeys Were Single Celled Organisms At The Same Time As The Dolphin Was.

The Egg 'came' First :jizz:

GorillaBearBear
11-05-2006, 06:48 PM
Oooh, moody. Shane, you are ever critical. Possibly the most pedantic and persickety person i have encountered so far. Is it not possible for you to look at the GOOD points of what I'm doing instead of forever putting me down? Well I know that's a hard thing to ask from someone not nearly as high or experienced as you in the way of the forums* but you could cut me a little slack.

How about you learn to handle criticism?

Thomp
11-05-2006, 06:51 PM
Shane Mate If You Don't Like It Piss Off Yeah?!

I'm Sure All Of Us Would Enjoy That.

Shane is entitled to his own goddamn opinion, if he has criticism then let him express it

Lured
11-05-2006, 07:18 PM
doesn't have to insult zhyls style though does he?

i mean he's done it to me aswell

Thomp
11-05-2006, 07:19 PM
doesn't have to insult zhyls style though does he?

Where is he insulting it? He was clearly pointing out the rules of the forum, where you sould not double post, or bump after a long space of time

There's nothing wrong with what Shane has done there

Lured
11-05-2006, 07:20 PM
zhyls post his rules

Thomp
11-05-2006, 07:26 PM
zhyls post his rules

...what?

Look, one of the forum rules clearly stated that double posting shouldn't really happen, and by bumping his own thread, he has just caused this arguement. What Zhyl did is not necessarily a bad thing, but by double posting and criticising Shane of something when Shane was only explaining the rules is just stupid

Maybe you better read the forum rules, stop trying to cause an arguement and just leave the thread alone

basstard
11-05-2006, 07:27 PM
Where is he insulting it? He was clearly pointing out the rules of the forum, where you sould not double post, or bump after a long space of time

There's nothing wrong with what Shane has done there

More to the point, he wrote that 3 months ago, and Lured thought it'd be a good idea just to say..."Stop being mean, Shane" ?

Zhyl
12-05-2006, 03:48 PM
Whoa, that was ages ago. In fact, I had only been on the forums a few days. Now, I've forgotten all about this. If I were stupid enough, I would edit all that out. I don't particularly like this article and I was happy for it just to sink to the bottom.

But I WILL get rid of the double post, as now I know better.

Lured
13-05-2006, 09:54 PM
i'm a noob leave me be!