Elections 2004

[el_diablo5711]

Who will get elected? Why? Are you voting/supporting Democratic or Republican?

[piemanmoo]

Anyone but Bush.

[PoofBird]

who are the candidates besides Democrates and Republicans?

[el_diablo5711]

not sure -- im sry all you repubs out there, but bush is a gay idiot... he makes this corny "fight against terrorism" BS, and in the process anhialates our economy... Democratic all the way (i think howard dean is the #1 democrat in polls right now)

[Sloth]

Originally posted by PoofBird
who are the candidates besides Democrates and Republicans? Nader mentioned he would try to run, but he doesn't think he will run as a Green Party member... otherwise i'm not sure who all is out there besides the Asshole party and the Idiot party...

yeah yeah... vote Howard Dean! He is supah fun time numbah 1 in the polls now! best vote for him... because polls know all!... because i'm an idiot...dur... :rolleyes:

fyi the polls have clark, dean, and kerry all about the same right now... Iowa will be voting tomorrow... we'll see what happens...

btw i don't know who i'm voting for yet...

[el_diablo5711]

im not old enough to vote lmao

[piemanmoo]

Plus 1 for both of you.

[canadian cub]

I think Bush is a complete fool and dems rok in 04

[canadian cub]

Gephardt dropped put today and dean is in 3rd in iowa.
Edwards is favorite in the New Hampshire primary

[I AM SHEEP]

Dean better win. Granted, he is a bit tempermental sometimes, but at least he is clear and desicive and you can tell he was born to be a leader.

[Mushroom]

heh
i'm from the UK, but i'd like to see Dean win the candidate elections, since it would be such a great difference between Bush and corporations and war and a slumped economy, and Dean with his relatively radical views (for American politics anyway).
Unfortunately, i don't think he will.
But i can dream ;)

[Sloth]

wah?... but Dean is the Democrat version of Dubya...

-he makes funny looking faces...
-he has speech problems...
-he is more secretive than Bush...
-he panders for votes...
-he has illusions of grandeur...

Republicans want Dean to win... well they rather have Sharpton win, but he won't... so Dean will do... and all you international Bush-haters don't want to see it, but Bush can easily beat Dean...

No, if Democrats are smart and i think they are suppose to be... And if they really want to beat Dubya... They will be better off voting for Kerry and Edwards...

and Dean with his relatively radical views (for American politics anyway).
well, since this is american politics... and if you want Bush to lose... why would you want the unelectable?

and you can tell he was born to be a leader. not in Iowa, it would seem...

I think Bush is a complete fool and dems rok in 04 ...and you keep being 'special'... oh and don't double post...

[el_diablo5711]

I like John Kerry... his name starts with J... oh yeah and he didnt go "them we'll go for michigan, and oregon, and south dakota! then we'll go for the white house! YEEEAGH!" :p

[I AM SHEEP]

oh come on, he was just excited (or shit faced drunk, I'm not quite sure which).

And besides, look what he did with vermont.

[el_diablo5711]

ya i know

[el_diablo5711]

Originally posted by piemanmoo
Anyone but Bush.


you have such a way with words *sniff, tear*

[vampiress]

i haven't decided yet. i'm disollusions with bush, but he is the enemy we know. i am not sure any of these democratc yahoos stand a chance as there is too many of them and nobody really knows much about them.
the whole primary buisness is ridiculus. i'll wait to really start caring until they decide which yahoo is actually running.

[dandaman]

The Dems should thank their lucky stars Dean's taking a nosedive. He was impossible to elect. He would have no chance at winning the ever-important "middle" as he was flung too far to the left. And he had a tendency to talk and talk and talk, and hope something good came out. He was trying to win the election based on pure emotion and getting people all riled up. I would argue the man is crazy. "YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!" Dean's burnout was predictable. He was like a car with less than a quarter tank of gas trying to race through the Indy 500 at max speed.

The Dems stand a much better chance with a more moderate canidate, like Kerry or Edwards. I'm surprised Lieberman has fallen off the map. He would have been the ideal canidate for them, in my opinion. Clark is just as bad as Dean.

As for Bush, he needs to make sure the economy keeps slowly creeping upward. If the economy doesn't take a nosedive, Bush has the advantage. Assuming he doesn't say anything totally asinine and nothing devastating happens in Iraq.

[CapitalismIsPoo]

Kucinich all the way! http://www.kucinich.net
The only reason he seemingly doesnt have a chance is that the corporate American media doesnt show him. Ever. If he loses, im voting for Nader in '04, assuming he runs.

[Dr-Electro]

Ok, kiddies, my 2 rupies worth.

I'm backing Kerry. Not because he is leading the polls after winning Iowa and New Hampshire. I am behind him all the way because he is as honest as a politician can be, he is a Viet Nam vet, like me, he is a no-nonsense moderate Democrat whose priorities are education and the economy. His priorities run deeper than campaign slogans and promises.

I have actually voted Libertarian in past elections because I believed that all the major party candidates were jackasses ane losers. This time, I think Kerry is a winner. We need to dump Bush before he has the whole country in the toilet for good. He's a worse president than Herbert Hoover, who started the Great Depression of the 1930's!

[el_diablo5711]

bravo. I agree 100%. DOWN WITH BUSH!