How do you make those toons? [Archive]

cts dragon

03-10-2003, 01:45 PM

Speaking of Flash...
Don't want to be spamming or anything, but heres my first ever cartoon
Fish Heads (http://www.deadtreekiller.co.uk/flash/fish1.htm)

And i'm working on another 1 at the moment which should be much better

Blamat

03-10-2003, 06:00 PM

Originally posted by weebl
buy it like everyone else.

Whoops I didn't know you had to buy it, I wasn't asking for an illeigal download or anything ;)

And that was an awesome cartoon, dragon.

:nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana:
Banana= Cool

ReAction

03-10-2003, 06:04 PM

Originally posted by Blamat
:nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana:
Banana= Cool [/B]

Overuse of Banana= Ass-kicking

Blamat

03-10-2003, 06:08 PM

Nerds who think they can kick my ass suck.

ReAction

03-10-2003, 06:10 PM

Originally posted by Blamat
Nerds who think they can kick my ass suck.

.... That's nice to know. Go back to school.

Blamat

03-10-2003, 06:12 PM

I can't go back to school, it just ended. :(

:nana: :nana: :nana: :nana:

KualaLumpur1997

03-10-2003, 09:21 PM

WOW! Fish heads is almost good enough for Weebls-stuff! I did a beautiful flash movie once starring Colonel Harland D. Sanders (the guy from KFC) - but lost it when we upgraded to windows 98 from windows 95

PoofBird

03-10-2003, 10:37 PM

yes, that fishheads cartoon had me giggling :)

Jimpy

03-10-2003, 11:14 PM

listen to it, hear the fishhead song, its like trying to brainwash you @_@ It has no tone of voice, just a calm, simple voice... yum.. thats the word that you memorize without knowing it, tis good

Blamat

04-10-2003, 12:53 AM

Ok I'm hooked on Fishhead song now.

Eat them up yum!

$p!k3

04-10-2003, 09:04 PM

Originally posted by KualaLumpur1997
WOW! Fish heads is almost good enough for Weebls-stuff! I did a beautiful flash movie once starring Colonel Harland D. Sanders (the guy from KFC) - but lost it when we upgraded to windows 98 from windows 95 '

lol...You know there are much better versions of Windows out now right? ;)

Oh and this is for ReAction:

:nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana:

AmmiSan

05-10-2003, 04:48 AM

the full fish heads song is wonderful

http://www.angelfire.com/creep/ammisan/Rolly_Polly_Fish_Heads.mp3

ReAction

05-10-2003, 05:18 AM

Originally posted by $p!k3
'

lol...You know there are much better versions of Windows out now right? ;)

Oh and this is for ReAction:

:nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana: :nana:

Alright, step outside, it's time for me to kick your ass.

or better yet, give me your address and I'll send you a bomb.

KualaLumpur1997

05-10-2003, 10:01 PM

Indeed. Why upgrade - it costs you a bomb, and all versions of Windows are pretty much the same - XP is just the same as ME for example, only different coloured toolbars and no DOS. Windows 95 with a decent processor will work just as well as any later version.

cts dragon

07-10-2003, 12:51 PM

Originally posted by KualaLumpur1997
Indeed. Why upgrade - it costs you a bomb, and all versions of Windows are pretty much the same - XP is just the same as ME for example, only different coloured toolbars and no DOS. Windows 95 with a decent processor will work just as well as any later version.
except that most new software and hardware won't work under winsows 95 due to restrictions, eg 95 can't cope with more than 256 MB of ram

Oh, and to all you that keep posting the :nana: ,

have this http://www.deadtreekiller.co.uk/b3ta/misc/banana.gif

Blamat

07-10-2003, 07:55 PM

Originally posted by cts dragon

Oh, and to all you that keep posting the :nana: ,

have this http://www.deadtreekiller.co.uk/b3ta/misc/banana.gif [/B]

Thats pretty lame, it would have been better if something hevavy landed on him.

KualaLumpur1997

07-10-2003, 09:34 PM

True, but I don't tend to keep much software on my PC that demands such memory. I'm currently on W98, 224 RAM, and I've never had problems with memory.

Garrett

08-10-2003, 01:12 AM

Originally posted by $p!k3
'

lol...You know there are much better versions of Windows out now right? ;)

98 kicks ass though.
98 deserves a pie. :mmmpie:

KualaLumpur1997

08-10-2003, 09:07 PM

good idea.

Andromeda

09-10-2003, 02:06 AM

Originally posted by KualaLumpur1997
XP is just the same as ME for example

WinME? <<< Sounds of violent barfing heard... >>>

Windows 95 with a decent processor will work just as well as any later version.

Only with Windows 95, you get to pick the color for your Blue-Screen of Death.

Rommie
...Blasting, Billowing Bursting forth with the Power of Ten-Billion Badger Sneezes.

skoo

09-10-2003, 09:20 AM

Windows 95 will not work anywhere NEAR as good as XP, even with the worlds best cpu. It doesnt support large ammounts of RAM.

Seraph

09-10-2003, 03:17 PM

I have windows XP on all my PC's, except for one.

Ill have to agree with the people that say that Windows XP is alot better.

The only thing that XP could do without... would be the fact that its trying so hard to be pretty and modern... but it just doesnt work for it.. haha :rolleyes:

Psychic Jack

15-10-2003, 09:46 AM

Well, I have XP, and I think the bars look quite nice. However, nothing is "futuristic," so-to-speak, since we are always in the present, and therefore, whatever is built is presentistic. ...or something...

And before I start to look stupid... (too late) Wasn't this thread originally about making flash movies?

davidh

15-10-2003, 12:54 PM

Windows ME is bloody awful. I've got it on my computer and Win98/2000/XP are *all* better than it, in my experience.

As for the original question. Although not condoning piracy in any way, if you were an evil man who wanted to deprive Macromedia of their dosh, you could

[deleted - you can guess what was here!]

But only evil people who deserve pain and misery would do this
;-)

When I've done music for stuff, I still use an old version of Cool Edit and a free edition of Renoise for putting together beats/songs.

Jeff The Jiff

15-10-2003, 01:21 PM

firstly if you use windows ME and you dont like it, why dont you change it? i use windows 98, windows 2000 and windows server 2003. win2k3 would be the best if it didnt have stupid opengl bugs and stuff.

secondly, you mentioned the forbidden word and should be punished severely. (hint: beginning with a C and ending with a K)
im sure everyone else has legally bought flash, havent they?

davidh

15-10-2003, 02:50 PM

Originally posted by Jeff The Jiff
firstly if you use windows ME and you dont like it, why dont you change it? i use windows 98, windows 2000 and windows server 2003. win2k3 would be the best if it didnt have stupid opengl bugs and stuff.

Can't afford to buy it. I need the cash to pay for my crack habit.

Originally posted by Jeff The Jiff
secondly, you mentioned the forbidden word and should be punished severely. (hint: beginning with a C and ending with a K)
im sure everyone else has legally bought flash, havent they?

Note to Macromedia's lawyers: *I've* legally bought Flash, too.

Jeff The Jiff

15-10-2003, 05:21 PM

you mean people actually buy windows? waiit.. sorry. i mean... i have bought every version of windows.

Seraph

15-10-2003, 08:42 PM

I dont think many people do buy windows, hrhr!

Ive only bought one version myself, and that was XP...
Even tho i have had many before it. :p

You can get hold of a copy soooo easily.

Its almost TOO easy... dont you think? :rolleyes:

not weebl

18-10-2003, 09:51 PM

I had to interject since I'm such a nerd. And if you can't tell, I'm new.
First off; if you're running windows server 2k3 and whining about the fact that it doesn't support openGL well shows a distinct lack of knowledge in the area of operating systems. Server OSes are designed with as little overhead as possible so they can run server-style applications with as little slowdown as possible. :) Of course the openGL support isn't going to be there... servers aren't supposed to be used to play games.

Secondly, I have to disagree with the remark that windows XP is just ME with a facelift. ME was based off windows 98 code, something that was just an extension of DOS. Windows XP is based off the windows NT (2000 series) codebase, and therefore is not related to Windows ME. It's actually a far more stable OS.

Now that I've irritated everyone... :)

Jeff The Jiff

19-10-2003, 09:52 AM

Originally posted by not weebl
First off; if you're running windows server 2k3 and whining about the fact that it doesn't support openGL well shows a distinct lack of knowledge in the area of operating systems. Server OSes are designed with as little overhead as possible so they can run server-style applications with as little slowdown as possible. :) Of course the openGL support isn't going to be there... yes, i realise that, but that isnt an excuse for microsoft to have stupid bugs. openGL applications dont have to include games, they could be 3D graphical applications like CAD/CAM which win2k3 wouldnt run properly. the thing is, windows server 2003 does support OpenGL and DirectX, but it doesnt work too well.
"aw, man, im gonna have to run OpenGL... lets just have a blue screen of death and dump the whole contents of the memory to the hard drive!"

not weebl

19-10-2003, 10:10 PM

Again, nobody uses servers for graphics-intensive applications. Get a workstation build.

Andromeda

19-10-2003, 11:25 PM

Originally posted by not weebl
Again, nobody uses servers for graphics-intensive applications. Get a workstation build.

EXACTLY. Servers are for being.. well.. Servers! They have to be code-streamlined in certain areas for speed and use alot of extra code to help with network connectivity and security issues. YOU DO NOT need to run Win2K3 Server for your graphics work. Just use Win XP Pro and get the best system for your needs! :)